Deployed Works Guide
For organisationsHow To Compare Two Or Three Providers After Option Review
Compare the same evidence, risks and costs for each provider, then record why your choice fits the work.
How To Compare Two Or Three Providers After Option Review guide trailer
A short walkthrough for this guide will appear here.
Audience
For organisations
Organisations comparing providers after option review
Time
2 minute read
Outcome
Compare the same evidence, risks and costs for each provider, then record why your choice fits the work.
Share this guide
PDF guide
Share this guide with your team.
Download the PDF for meetings or offline use. The web guide has the latest version.
Related guides
Before / after transformation
Turn a provider-shaped request into an outcome brief.
Use this sequence when a need starts as a provider label but the real requirement is a business result.
Start
Outcome
What needs to be different for the business, customer, team or workflow?
Diagnose
Current blocker
What is manual, blocked, risky, slow, expensive or unclear today?
Shape
Useful context
Success signals, non-negotiable constraints, evidence, timeline and budget signal.
Routes
Deployment routes
Derive viable approaches before asking the buyer to choose a person, tool, vendor or service.
Guide summary
What this guide helps you do
Who it is for
Best fit readers
- A founder, operator or capability buyer with two or three reviewed providers.
The problem
Start with the outcome before choosing a capability route.
A useful option review keeps the next decision grounded in the outcome. Compare the capability brief, provider proof, fit indicators, proof gaps, delivery model and commercial risk.
Step by step
Build the brief around the work.
Start with the work, not the personality
Open the comparison by restating the work, outcome and constraints in the capability brief.
Compare against the brief
Create a row for each provider and score fit against the must-have outcomes, timeline, budget signal, access needs and handover requirements.
Compare proof, not claims
Look for examples, references, case notes, metrics, shipped work or before-and-after evidence.
Compare availability and delivery model
Check who will do the work, how often they are available, what the first two weeks look like and how decisions will move.
Compare commercial fit
Review price beside scope, assumptions, risks and handover.
Complete the decision worksheet
Write a short decision note that names the selected provider, the reason, the known proof gaps, the first scope, the budget assumption and the conditions that must be true before work starts.
Example
Use this on Deployed Works
After receiving three providers, a buyer reviews each capability profile against the brief. Provider A has the closest sector proof but limited availability.
Template
Provider comparison worksheet
Capability brief outcome: Must-have constraints: Provider A: - Brief fit: - Relevant proof: - Proof gaps: - Delivery model: - Commercial fit: - Key risk: - Final question:
Common mistakes
Avoid these traps
- Choosing the most confident provider without checking proof.
- Treating fit indicators as automated ranking.
- Comparing price without comparing scope and assumptions.
Checklist
Ready to publish when
- The work and outcome from the capability brief are visible.
- Each provider is compared against the same criteria.
- Proof and proof gaps are written down.
- Commercial model is compared with scope and risk.
FAQ
Questions this guide usually raises
Should we pick the provider with the strongest proof?
Proof matters, but it is not the only factor. Compare proof with availability, delivery model, commercial fit, risk and how well the provider understands your capability brief.
Do fit indicators rank providers for us?
No. Fit indicators are structured signals that help organise human review.
Take it with you
Share this guide with your team.
Download the PDF for meetings or offline use. The web guide has the latest version.
Share this guide
Use the canonical page link. No social scripts or tracking widgets are loaded.
Use the guide
Turn the work into a capability brief.
Compare the same evidence, risks and costs for each provider, then record why your choice fits the work.